Using AHP to identify the priority equipment for maintenance actions

Journal article

Abdelghani Mohammed Bouchaala, Rachid Noureddine
International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), vol. 12, IGI Global, 2020, pp. 26--42

DOI: 10.4018/IJDSST.2020070102

Read

Cite

APA Click to copy
Bouchaala, A. M., & Noureddine, R. (2020). Using AHP to identify the priority equipment for maintenance actions. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), 12, 26–42. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDSST.2020070102

Chicago/Turabian Click to copy
Bouchaala, Abdelghani Mohammed, and Rachid Noureddine. “Using AHP to Identify the Priority Equipment for Maintenance Actions.” International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST) 12 (2020): 26–42.

MLA Click to copy
Bouchaala, Abdelghani Mohammed, and Rachid Noureddine. “Using AHP to Identify the Priority Equipment for Maintenance Actions.” International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), vol. 12, IGI Global, 2020, pp. 26–42, doi:10.4018/IJDSST.2020070102.

BibTeX Click to copy

@article{bouchaala2020a,
  title = {Using AHP to identify the priority equipment for maintenance actions},
  year = {2020},
  journal = {International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST)},
  pages = {26--42},
  publisher = {IGI Global},
  volume = {12},
  doi = {10.4018/IJDSST.2020070102},
  author = {Bouchaala, Abdelghani Mohammed and Noureddine, Rachid}
}

Abstract

The prioritization of equipment is among the decisions of great interest in maintenance management, given the effects it reflects on numerous sub-functions and the dependence it implies on various factors. The mastery of the techniques in this context is gaining an increasing importance, especially in heavy industries operating multiple production lines. According to the literature, the AHP method (Analytic hierarchy process) is among the most common techniques to resolve this problem, despite the concerns it involves. Knowing that this technique supports two synthesis modes: Distributive and ideal, a confusing conflict is noticed; although the latter seems theoretically more adapted to this problem, the first dominates in the practical aspect. In response to this conflict, the objective of this work is to show that the ideal synthesis mode is more suitable, through a comparative approach within this context. An improved AHP-approach is implicitly proposed within the study.

Keywords:

Criticality, Distributive AHP, Ideal AHP, Maintenance, MCDM, Performance Evaluation, Prioritization

Using AHP to identify the priority equipment for maintenance actions

Journal article

Cite

Abstract

Keywords:

Follow this website